Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Deathwatch House Rules
Post your homebrew house rules here.
Moderator: FFGAntonThe Spaniard Topics: 307 | Posts: 3070
Dornian Heresy Deathwatch - Work in Progress
by Mkall
Published on 01 March 2012 - 15:29:03
Page 2 of 2 (28 messages) « First page... 1 2
Reply #16 | Published on 08 July 2012 - 00:55:51

Vergaul said:

 I registered just to say awesome.  My only regret is that it is too difficult to fit these chapters in to a canon/standard Deathwatch game without resorting to the old "frozen in stasis before the Horus Heresy" trope.  Keep up the good work!

Gotta love the Mary Sues and Super Special Snowflakes. And everyone that makes a character that is "really tall for an Astartes."

Without Signature
Reply #17 | Published on 13 July 2012 - 05:27:53

Just noticed something when some players in my gaming group wanted to roll up characters. The Iron Hands can get two starting cybernetics but there is no limit on what these can be. Sure bionic arms and legs can give you bonus toughness in locations but I have I did think that the as written option to walk into character creation with a combination of two of the following is a bit much MIU, Auspex Array or  Servo Arm. I know in regular 40k they use servo arms outside the tech marines but as I pointed out to a player I have only heard of these being used by War Smith level Iron Warriors. It might do to specify if these options weren't your intent and if they were I'd advise considering it more carefully because many players will take these options nine times out of ten, a free auspex, deadly close combat weapon of destruction or +10 to a bunch of things including BS tests is a bit much. Still great work over all as I've said before, just didn't know if you had realised this rule as written.

Without Signature

Reply #18 | Published on 13 July 2012 - 08:20:12

As one of Gaius' prospective players, I will suggest that if MIU is intended to be allowed, that MIU interfaces be restricted to the character's own personal and signature wargear and perhaps certain relic weapons. A flat +10 to BS checks with any ranged weapon is very good, probably too much so.

I don't think an augur array or even an MIU is automatically better than a flat increase to toughness bonus which is what comes with a bionic replacement. After refreshing my knowledge of normal 40k Iron Warriors, I'm fine with restricting servo-arms to Warsmiths and techmarines.

 

Pericula in mora

Danger in delay

Decessor's House Rules (DW v1.0)

Reply #19 | Published on 13 July 2012 - 09:52:24
4
8

 A thing to remember. The MIU bonus to shooting still comes from jacking into the weapon. That's not something I'd assume all weapons are made with; so I'd agree with it being an option only for Sig Wargear and vehicle weapons.

Quoted from Nolsutt:

You have to be a badass if you go to some random planetagree to go hunt dinsaurs naked without any fuss.

 

In my M42, Space Marines have balls, female Space Marines are called Sisters of Battle (and kick major butt), Chaos isn't STUPID evil,no one is a mindless battledrone except for combat servitors.
 

Reply #20 | Published on 13 July 2012 - 12:58:02
2
1

Gaius said:

 

Just noticed something when some players in my gaming group wanted to roll up characters. The Iron Hands can get two starting cybernetics but there is no limit on what these can be. Sure bionic arms and legs can give you bonus toughness in locations but I have I did think that the as written option to walk into character creation with a combination of two of the following is a bit much MIU, Auspex Array or  Servo Arm. I know in regular 40k they use servo arms outside the tech marines but as I pointed out to a player I have only heard of these being used by War Smith level Iron Warriors. It might do to specify if these options weren't your intent and if they were I'd advise considering it more carefully because many players will take these options nine times out of ten, a free auspex, deadly close combat weapon of destruction or +10 to a bunch of things including BS tests is a bit much. Still great work over all as I've said before, just didn't know if you had realised this rule as written.

 

 

An interesting point and one I should revisit, thanks for bringing it up.  I would be very interested to hear more feedback if your group actually starts gaming with these characters!

The Night Lords are nearing completion; only a week or so and then I move on to the next part of the project.  I plan on having at least one advanced specialty per legion, Thousand Sons Sehkmet Psyker Terminators, Night Lords Prophets, Iron Warrior Siegelords and more!

Without Signature
Reply #21 | Published on 13 July 2012 - 17:47:43

It occured to me that a reskinned Deathwing Veteran could work quite well for the Iron Warriors. Both have a reputation for being relentless, callous proponents of using massed fire to bring down enemies.

Pericula in mora

Danger in delay

Decessor's House Rules (DW v1.0)

Reply #22 | Published on 20 July 2012 - 15:25:28
2
1

The Night Lords are done!  I'm afraid I may have made them rely a little too much on the ability to generate Fear, but I suppose time and playtesting will tell me for sure.

Rapidshare Link: rapidshare.com/files/706851798/DHDW.pdf

Google Docs Link: docs.google.com/open

Note the version number at the top of the document, I figured that's the best way to do this moving forward.  This may be the last you guy s hear from me on this for a while.  I want to work on the advancements for a while to make sure I know where I'm going with it.

If anyone wants to help/playtest/provide feedback/brainstorm ideas or wants to be an artist, please reach me by email: mkall@seibertron.com.  I do intend to see this through, but patience may be required.

Without Signature
Reply #23 | Published on 27 October 2012 - 02:28:31
0
1

Hope this is still going well, looking forward to seeing the finished results. I was working on loyalist death guard(though returned them to Dusk Raider origins) rules if I ever finish them up I'll toss them up here, maybe they can help.

Without Signature
Reply #24 | Published on 03 November 2012 - 00:39:36

Good work, I'd love to see some Death Guard to make a Deathshroud!

Reply #25 | Published on 04 November 2012 - 12:33:05
2
1

The Russian said:

Good work, I'd love to see some Death Guard to make a Deathshroud!

Believe me, I've wanted to make the Death Guard too, however I'm waiting on the "official" DH Death Guard before I write them up, which at this rate may not be until 2015 given the writer's constant disappearances for months at a time.

Without Signature
Reply #26 | Published on 05 November 2012 - 10:06:03

Mkall said:

The Russian said:

 

Good work, I'd love to see some Death Guard to make a Deathshroud!

 

 

Believe me, I've wanted to make the Death Guard too, however I'm waiting on the "official" DH Death Guard before I write them up, which at this rate may not be until 2015 given the writer's constant disappearances for months at a time.

"Official" Death Guard? I haven't heard of this… and yes, a Houdini writer isn't good for the most part.

Either way, they have been my second favorite Legion for a while, pre-heresy though.

Reply #27 | Published on 05 November 2012 - 10:39:31
2
1

The Russian said:

Mkall said:

 

The Russian said:

 

Good work, I'd love to see some Death Guard to make a Deathshroud!

 

 

Believe me, I've wanted to make the Death Guard too, however I'm waiting on the "official" DH Death Guard before I write them up, which at this rate may not be until 2015 given the writer's constant disappearances for months at a time.

 

 

"Official" Death Guard? I haven't heard of this… and yes, a Houdini writer isn't good for the most part.

Either way, they have been my second favorite Legion for a while, pre-heresy though.

Official being Index Astartes article that details the Death Guard in their 40K state had Dorn been the Arch-Traitor instead of Horus.  As much as I'd like to claim credit for the whole idea and inter-twining lore, I'm just someone who takes someone's else's creative juices and twists it into Deathwatch-compatibility - with their permission of course.  Without the writer's take on the Death Guard, I don't want to get presumptuous even though the recent Forge World book is probably a good indication of things to come.

Without Signature
Reply #28 | Published on 05 November 2012 - 15:31:59

Mkall said:

 

Official being Index Astartes article that details the Death Guard in their 40K state had Dorn been the Arch-Traitor instead of Horus.  As much as I'd like to claim credit for the whole idea and inter-twining lore, I'm just someone who takes someone's else's creative juices and twists it into Deathwatch-compatibility - with their permission of course.  Without the writer's take on the Death Guard, I don't want to get presumptuous even though the recent Forge World book is probably a good indication of things to come.

 

 

I see, I thought you meant something in Dark Heresy. Haha

I can understand that wanting to wait on the IA author!

Page 2 of 2 (28 messages) « First page... 1 2

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS